Legal Opinion

County of San Mateo v. Coburn

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1900No. S.F. No. 1450Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County, from an order denying a new trial, and from an order authorizing possession. George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1OpinionBeatty, C. J.

I dissent from the order denying a rehearing. A county, within the meaning of section 14 of article I of the constitution, is either a municipal corporation or it is not a corporation at all, and in either case it is entitled in condemning a right of way to set off benefits against damages. (Moran v. Ross, 79 Cal. 159; Moran v. Ross, 79 Cal. 549.) In my opinion, a county is a municipal corporation within the meaning of this clause of the constitution, and the decision in People v. McFadden, 81 Cal. 489, 4 that it is not a municipal corporation, within the meaning of another provision (i. e.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Graves v. McFaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Moran v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Moran v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API