Legal Opinion

(HC)Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 24, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01513Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 WALTER A.T.,1 Case No. 1:24-cv-01513-EPG-HC 11 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS AND GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 13 FACILITY ADMINISTRATOR, GOLDEN STATE ANNEX,2 (ECF No. 16) 14 Respondent. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 15 TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT 16 17 Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons set forth herein,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API