Legal Opinion

Warren v. Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oueiam.

We see no error in the judgment of the court below. The allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and his prayer for relief we think are so general and indefinite that under our most liberal practice plaintiff is not entitled to an issue as to the question of valuable improve- • ments. The principle invoked by plaintiff is well settled in Pass v. Brooks, 125 N. C., 129; S. c., 127 N. C., 119, and the more recent case of Insurance Co. v. Cordon, 208 N. C., 723. The pleadings of plaintiff and the theory upon which the case was heard in the court below does not now permit plaintiff to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. CordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Pass v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Pass v. Brooks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API