Corvin v. Hyatt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after a trial before a jury.
The sole question presented for determination is:
Was the verdict of the jury for $5,000 excessive damages, as the decedent was seventy-seven years of age, the mother of plaintiffs, who devoted most of her time, services, society, comfort, and counsel to one of her daughters with whom she lived for twenty-two years?
The jury’s verdict will not be set aside upon appeal on the ground that the damages are excessive, unless the verdict is so outrageously excessive as to suggest at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kerrison v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bach v. C. Swanston & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Schulman v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Peckham v. Warner Bros. PicturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Junge v. Midland Counties Public Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Corral v. SagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.