Rimpotti v. Household Finance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
Plaintiffs here seek to have declared void and cancelled a note and chattel mortgage given upon the making of a loan to them by defendant, a lender licensed under article *545IX of the Banking Law. The loan was to be repaid in twelve monthly instalments. By section 353 of the Banking Law defendant was required to deliver, at the time the loan was made, a statement “ showing in clear and distinct terms the amount and date of the loan and of its maturity, the nature of the security, if any, for the loan, the name and address of the borrower and of the licensee, and the agreed rate of charge; * *…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atta v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Laham v. Domestic Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- Credit Finance Service, Inc. v. AbleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Consumers Credit Corp. of Mississippi v. StanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1967