Burke v. Hindman
Oregon Supreme Court
From Baker: William Smith, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. This is a suit by Thomas C. Burke against Parilee F. Hindman and M. J. Hindman, her husband, and the Hot Springs Company, a corporation, to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property situated in Baker County.
Read the full summary
From Baker: William Smith, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. This is a suit by Thomas C. Burke against Parilee F. Hindman and M. J. Hindman, her husband, and the Hot Springs Company, a corporation, to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property situated in Baker County. The complaint, which is too voluminous to be incorporated in this statement, alleges, in substance, that Dr. W. J. May is president of the defendant corporation, the Hot Springs Company; that about September 1, 1906, acting on behalf of the company, he represented that the lands described in plaintiff’s mortgage were…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBride
For the sake of brevity, we have given only an outline of the pleadings in this case, and, as the decision depends largely upon questions of fact, a discussion in detail of the evidence would not be of any permanent value or of any interest to any one outside of the interested parties. This case was tried before the judge below in open court, and his opportunity of estimating the value of the evidence of the various witnesses was superior to ours, and while, upon our own examination of the evidence, we should feel impelled to take the same view of the facts that he reached, yet his opinion,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Oregon Orchards Co. v. BakkeOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Piascyk v. MalonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Young v. Terrace Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933