Brown v. Hamil
Supreme Court of Alabama
Api>EAL-from the Circuit Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. John P. Hubbard. This action was brought by John M. Hamil, against John O. Brown, to recover damages for an alleged conver-ioii by defendant of a crop raised on rented land, with notice of plaintiffs lien as landlord; and was commenced on tin 18th September, 1882. The complaint contained a single count, which alleged that the plaintiff leased certain lands, for the year 1881, to one C. II.
Read the full summary
Api>EAL-from the Circuit Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. John P. Hubbard. This action was brought by John M. Hamil, against John O. Brown, to recover damages for an alleged conver-ioii by defendant of a crop raised on rented land, with notice of plaintiffs lien as landlord; and was commenced on tin 18th September, 1882. The complaint contained a single count, which alleged that the plaintiff leased certain lands, for the year 1881, to one C. II. Smart, and made necessary advances to enable him to raise a crop on said land, whereby plaintiff acquired and had a lien on the crops raised by…
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
— -In December, 1881, John O. Brown sued out an attachment against Smart and Henly, which was levied *508on farm products that had been grown that year. Brown asserted claim to the property attached, under a written contract of lien for advances to malee a crop, commonly called a crop-lien. After the property was attached, Smart, one of the defendants, gave a replevin bond with two sureties, one of whom was <J. M. Hamil, appellee in this cause. The attached property was then restored to the defendant in attachment. Brown recovered judgment by default against Smart and Iienly, defendants in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adler v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Collins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
- McMillan v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Brown v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Mitchell v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roswald & Stoll v. Hobbie & TeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Elyton Land Co. v. South & North Ala. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Sands v. HammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948