Frank C. Bailey Enterprises, Inc. v. Cargill, Incorporated, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the district court correctly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find that the appellee carried its burden of showing that there was no genuine issue as to any-material fact and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). Once the movant has carried this burden, the non-moving party “must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(e). If the non-moving party does not do so, summary judgment for the movant is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas C. Oglesby v. Terminal Transport Company, Inc. And Local 728, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters, Chauffeurs and WarehousemenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Rudolph Sweet, Eddie Rhyne at Al. v. Robert E. Childs, Etc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by53 opinions
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Frank M. OakleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Keenan v. TejedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Andre Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.