Legal Opinion

Moore v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Casco County. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Shattuck, J.:

Tbe liability of tbe respondent, Miller, in tbis case must be ascertained by tbe writing-offered in evidence, including *255the note sued on. These writings show that Minear made a promissory note to the First National Bank of Idaho, for four thousand dollars, bearing interest at two per cent, a month, and due August 4, 1874. About the date of the maturity of this note, an extension of the time of payment was sought, and Miller was requested or asked by letter from the cashier of the bank to indorse this note, which by letter he consented to do. The cashier then sent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savage v. BevierNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1856
  2. Billings v. JaneNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. First National Bank v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McFeron v. DoyensOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Columbia Hotel Co. v. RosenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API