Legal Opinion

Koethe v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, McKelvy, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court. 1

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. The respondent here makes the objection that not only was no case or bill of exceptions allowed or signed by the judge, but the so-called “case” does not show that it contains the whole of the evidence on the issue or issues as to which it is claimed that the verdict is against the evidence. The objection is well taken. Henry v. Hinman, 21 Minn. 378 ; Abrahams v. Sheehan, 27 Minn. 401.

Order affirmed.

Dickinson, J., because of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. HinmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Abrahams v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boright v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API