Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1993No. CA CR 93-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant, Brad Taylor, was convicted in municipal court of the misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated, first offense. He then appealed to circuit court. On the day set for his trial de novo in circuit court, appellant failed to appear. The circuit court declined to hold the trial in appellant’s absence, dismissed the appeal, and ordered that the municipal court’s sentence be put into execution. Appellant appeals from the circuit court’s order, contending only that the court erred in denying his attorney’s request that appellant be tried in absen-tia. We affirm.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  2. Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Whitmire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API