State v. Tinch
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree assault and armed criminal action and the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, therefore only a brief recitation of the facts is necessary. On September 9, 1990 at around 1 a.m., Defendant was standing on the corner of Alsobrook and Saratoga Streets. He was approached by Isaiah Taylor who wanted to purchase marijuana for Christopher Hill and some crack cocaine for Hill’s friend, Cooney. Taylor obtained some crack cocaine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. LeisureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MeinhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995