Cardoza v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentEmas, J.
I do not take issue with the fact that the clerk made a mistake in failing to discharge the forfeiture and in entering a final judgment of forfeiture. Nor do I take issue with the fact that, ultimately and on the merits, Appellants are entitled to have the judgment vacated. However, these are not the issues before this Court. The singular issue before this Court is simply this: Whether Appellants were required to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 903.27(5) before obtaining the relief sought in the trial court.4 To me, the answer is as clear and unequivocal as the language of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Resolute Insurance Company v. State, Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Mike Snapp Bail Bonds v. Orange CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- State ex rel. Metropolitan Dade County v. QuesadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988