Legal Opinion
iMatter Utah v. Njord
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 4, 2013No. Case No. 2:11-CV-394PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. SHELBY, District Judge.
This case arises out of permitting problems that were encountered by two groups who wished to march down State Street in Salt Lake City to raise awareness about climate change. The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) required the two groups, iMatter Utah and Positive Change Utah, to obtain insurance for the events and to sign an indemnification form that would protect UDOT and the State of Utah from liability for certain actions that might occur during the march. The members of the climate change groups argue that the insurance and indemnification…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- iMatter Utah v. NjordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Martin v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021