Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Engel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the court on an application for a writ of assistance. The proofs herein impel me to determine that the application be denied. The demand for possession, on which the application for the writ is predicated, is addressed "to Charles E.S. Simpson and Edna B. Simpson, his wife," and is signed by the petitioners herein, who, as appears thereby, authorized one William A. Oliver to take and receive for them possession of the premises therein mentioned. The affidavit of Mr. Oliver, which is attached to said demand by way of proof of service thereof, recites that on the 9th day…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Home Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America v. DavisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. Schenck v. ConoverNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1860
  3. Barton v. BeattyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Robert-SurzanoDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API