Zeigler v. Coast to Coast Stores
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
In this workmen’s compensation case claimant argues that she is permanently and totally disabled and in the alternative that the claim should be remanded for the consideration of additional evidence which was offered but refused in the circuit court.
We affirm on both issues. Claimant, who is now 55 years old, injured her back in 1967 while working as a clerk in a hardware store. A myelogram was performed followed by a laminectomy which did not produce much relief. Because of persistent back and right leg pain, she had a second myelogram in May of 1972 and as a result a neurosurgeon and an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mansfield v. CAPLENER BROTHERSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Buster v. Chase Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Maumary v. Mayfair MarketsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Hobbs v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Howerton v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984