Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Siegel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 12, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for an accounting, for conversion, and to recover damages for an alleged breach of a stipulation of settlement entered into in a divorce action, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated May 17, 1991, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted those branches of the motion which were to dismiss the third and fourth causes of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boronow v. BoronowNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Petritis v. PetritisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Meier v. MeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sileo v. SileoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Blasich v. BlasichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoyt v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Sacks v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bukovinsky v. BukovinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Michael Rodger BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020