Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parrino v. Landon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 22, 1955No. Gen. No. 10,757Published

1DissentDoye, J.

In my opinion neither count of tbe complaint stated a cause of action against appellant and I therefore respectfully dissent.

Tbe only allegations of both counts one and two of this complaint as to defendant, Pike, are that tbe motor vehicle operated by tbe plaintiff, Marjorie I. Parrino, came into collision witb a vehicle owned by defendant, Elmer R. Pike, which was then and there being driven by Margaret Landon witb the consent and knowledge of tbe defendant, Elmer R. Pike. By Ms default, Elmer R. Pike admitted the truth of these allegations.

Upon the oral argument in this court, counsel for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arkin v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. White v. SeitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Gustafson v. Consumers Sales Agency, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Connett v. WingetIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lohr v. Barkmann Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API