Legal Opinion

Mullinnix v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1986No. 72404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, selling cocaine. Held:

1. Defendant’s first enumeration of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. The State’s evidence shows that an undercover Georgia Bureau of Investigation (“GBI”) agent arranged a purchase of cocaine. Later, the GBI agent was waiting at an arranged rendezvous when two men arrived in an automobile. The passenger reached out the window and handed the cocaine to the agent. The agent handed the money to the passenger who handed it to the driver.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McCoy v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Milsap v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Tierney v. Reed Lallier ChevroletNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2001
  5. Tierney v. Reed Lallier ChevroletNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API