Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott Housing Systems, Inc. v. Hickox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1985No. 69259Published

1DissentCarley, Judge

Because, on the record before us, it clearly appears to me that judgment in favor of the defendant was demanded as a matter of law, I must respectfully dissent to the majority’s finding no error in the trial court’s failure to grant a directed verdict in favor of the defendant.

The majority concludes that the jury “properly could have found that Scott’s officers and employees were the cause of plaintiff’s arrest without a warrant and his subsequent unlawful detention.” (Emphasis supplied.) (Majority opinion, page 25.) One of the cases upon which the majority places great reliance is Webb v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hammond v. D. C. Black Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Webb v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. JC PENNEY COMPANY v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. W. & J. Sloane Selling Agents Inc. v. Tampa Chair & Table Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API