Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1932No. 14895Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant renews his insistence that our holding the trial court not in error in charging the jury on aggravated assault, — is in conflict with prior opinions of this court, notably Dusek v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 519, 89 S. W., 271, and Charles v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 459, 196 S. W., 179.

We find nothing in the Dusek case, supra, indicating that the alleged assault was upon a child of tender years who, both from the record and in the very nature of things, would have little understanding of' what would be a-…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Dusek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API