Legal Opinion
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. Burmester
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 5, 1957No. 13041PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODRUFF, Justice.
This is a personal injury suit instituted by the appellee, Kurt Burmester, against the appellants, Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, James W. Maxcey, D. D. Danner, and Danner’s Marine Guard Service, a Partnership, in which Marina Mercante Nicaragüense, S. A., intervened. As suggested by counsel, the appellants and intervenor, for the sake of brevity, will be referred to hereafter as Belt, Danner, and Intervenor.
Appellee, Kurt Burmester, a German national, sought a recovery of damages totaling $213,500 accruing to him by reason of personal injuries sustained by him on…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. FarnsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1950
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Harris Corp. v. Comair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. LockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.