Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Frank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PPEAL from district court, Cass county; Hon. William B. McConnell, Judge. cited: Harrison v. King, 9 Ohio St. 388; Go wan v. Hanson, 55 Wis. 341. cited, upon the point stated in the foregoing syllabus: Rollins v. Kohn, 66 Wis. 658; Sackett v. Partridge, 4 Iowa 416; Churchill v. Fullrain, 8 id. 46; Wade on Attachments, vol. 1, page 298.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.

On December 27, 1887, plaintiffs commenced this action, alleging an indebtedness on account for goods sold and delivered in the sum of $3,136.91, and that said amount was due and payable. The action was aided by attach*207ment. The writ of attachment was issued upon the affidavit of H. F. Miller, attorney for plaintiff, setting forth the statutory ground of defendant’s non-residence, and reiterating the statement that the debt was due. The warrant of attachment was delivered to the sheriff of Cass county on December 27, 1887, and on the same day an alias warrant was delivered to the sheriff of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevada First National Bank v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Lindskog v. SchouweilerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Western Twine Co. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API