Legal Opinion

Cusenbary v. Latimer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Young. Tried below before Hon. A. H. Carrigan.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is presented upon the trial court’s conclusions without a statement of facts. Appellant was the plaintiff in the action, and he alleges in his petition that “in the month of April, 1901, plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with the defendant, whereby plaintiff agreed with defendant to .purchase and the defendant agreed to sell the land” described in the petition for the sum of $400, and he prayed for specific performance of the contract.

Save some letters not deemed material, the alleged contract is based upon the following correspondence between M.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Patton v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Jones v. CarverTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Mathews v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Mitchell v. IrelandTexas Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cantrell v. GarrardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Rosen v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Gatewood v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Sutton v. ShanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API