Legal Opinion

Speicher v. Sowell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 42,607Published

1OpinionBushnell, J.

(for reversal). I am unable to concur in the affirmance of the order of the trial court.

The record contains supplementary order No. 10 of the office of price administration issued July 15, 1942, and the amendment thereto issued December 11, 1942. These orders expressly exclude judicial sales from the operation of price schedules except when “machinery products” are.involved such as in the instant case.

The precise question involved here was not in issue in Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U. S. 414 (64 Sup. Ct. 660, 88 L. Ed. 834 [decided March 27, 1944]), but the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. McPherson v. BlackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Book Tower Garage, Inc. v. Local No. 415, International Union, U. A. W. A.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API