Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Ticor Title Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2009No. 80999-2PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 — Petitioners Dale Campbell and Tina Fereira, a married couple (the Campbells), purchased a lot in Stevens County that had once been part of a larger parcel. At the time of purchase, they obtained title insurance from Ticor Title Insurance Co. Some years later a neighbor initiated an action to reform the Campbells’s deed so that it would be encumbered by a pedestrian easement. The easement was originally granted at the time the larger parcel was subdivided and was intended to burden the lot next to the Campbells but was obstructed by a home on the burdened property. The Campbells tendered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Campbell v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lallas v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lallas v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API