Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Peterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 1974No. Civ. 41895PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Petitioner Elizabeth K. Peterson and respondent Roy Otto Peterson both appeal from those portions of an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage concerning spousal support and community property. The only issue argued on appeal is the disposition of Roy’s pension rights as a federal civil service employee.
Facts
The parties were married in 1941, and since July 1942 Roy has been employed by the federal government. He is a member of the United States Civil Service Retirement System.
The system permits retirement with a pension under various circumstances, which we will…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.