Legal Opinion

Perman v. C. H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 21, 2008No. 040100852 2A126341PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff, personally and as the personal representative of the estate of Donald Perman, 1 appeals, challenging the trial court’s allowance of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Quimby Welding Supplies, Inc., 2 on claims arising out of decedent’s alleged exposure to asbestos while working as a welder and sheet metal mechanic at American Sheet Metal (ASM) in Tualatin between 1966 and 1978. The trial court granted summary judgment, based on its determination that plaintiff had failed to present evidence sufficient to permit a reasonable trier of fact to find that defendant had supplied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. West v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Austin v. A. J. Zinda Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anne Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Greer v. ACE Hardware Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Gloria Andrews v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
  4. Laux v. Akebono Brake Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API