Legal Opinion
King v. King
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 25, 1996No. Civil 94-140-SDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Senior District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiffs Cheryl and Doug King, husband and wife, seek to recover damages as a result of injuries sustained by Cheryl King while snow-tubing on residence premises of defendant Gregg King.
Presently before the court are plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint and defendant’s motion to dismiss. Appropriate objections and, as to the motion to amend, a reply, have been interposed thereto.
Background
Briefly stated, plaintiffs allege, 1 inter alia, that defendant “had a duty to exercise reasonable care not to submit Cheryl King to an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- The Dartmouth Review, on Behalf of Its Officers, Staff and Subscribers v. Dartmouth CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc., Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burns v. AAF-McQuay, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
- Desrochers v. Manchester Body . . .District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- King v. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996