Legal Opinion

Heiss v. City of Casper Planning & Zoning Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1997No. 96-146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Appellants Susan and William Heiss (Heisses) appeal the order affirming a conditional use permit granted by the City of Casper Planning and Zoning Commission (Commission). We reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to remand to the Commission.

The Heisses present the following issues:

A.Whether the decision by the Casper Planning and Zoning Commission (the “Commission”) in Case No. CU-95-006 (the “Case”) was “supported by substantial evidence” when there was no evidence or testimony presented by the applicant in that case.

B. Whether the Commission complied…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. School District No. 9 v. District Boundary Board Ex Rel. Fremont CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ebzery v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sechrist v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Frank v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Board of Dental ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Candice Reichenberg v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API