State v. Cardin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The first question raised by the defendant’s exceptions is whether he can properly be convicted of a second offense under RSA 262:19 (supp.) when his first conviction was in Massachusetts. The statute, so far as material, reads as follows: “Any person who shall be convicted of operating, or attempting to operate, a motor vehicle upon any way while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . shall be imprisoned . . . Upon a second conviction he may be imprisoned ... his license shall be revoked and he shall be ineligible for a license for the next three calendar years.” The defense claims…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hinton v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- State v. TardiffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. LukasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.