Legal Opinion

State v. Cardin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1959No. 4786PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The first question raised by the defendant’s exceptions is whether he can properly be convicted of a second offense under RSA 262:19 (supp.) when his first conviction was in Massachusetts. The statute, so far as material, reads as follows: “Any person who shall be convicted of operating, or attempting to operate, a motor vehicle upon any way while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . shall be imprisoned . . . Upon a second conviction he may be imprisoned ... his license shall be revoked and he shall be ineligible for a license for the next three calendar years.” The defense claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People v. PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hinton v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. State v. TardiffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. State v. LukasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API