Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Daniel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1946No. 30651PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

We are in accord with the Court of Appeals in its conclusion that the overruling of a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not a final order upon which an appeal may be predicated.

Counsel for appellant rely upon Section 11601, General Code, which permits judgment to be rendered when upon statements in the pleadings one party is entitled by law to judgment in his favor.

A motion for judgment on the pleadings is in the nature of a general demurrer and presents only questions of law. 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 877, Section 286; State, ex rel. Dunphy, v. Graham, Judge, 146 Ohio St.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David v. MatterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. McMillen v. Willys Sales Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Home Owners' Service Corp. v. HadleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Swank v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Miller v. CohenOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API