Bate v. Securly, Inc.

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Sheri BATE, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-1304-AGS-DEB 4 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND 5 v. DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 15) AS MOOT 6 SECURLY, INC., 7 Defendant. 8 “[E]very federal court has a continuing obligation to ensure that it possesses 9 subject-matter jurisdiction.” United States v. Ceja-Prado,

333 F.3d 1046, 1047

(9th Cir. 10 2003). This Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction and “must dismiss the action.” See 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 12 BACKGROUND 13 In their amended complaint, plaintiffs sue defendant…