Legal Opinion

Pitsenbarger v. Nuzum

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1983No. 15868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

In this case we are asked to invoke our original jurisdiction and, by writ of prohibition, prohibit the respondent judge from going forward with petitioner’s criminal trial. The petitioner, James E. Pitsenbarger, contends that the action of the Honorable Jack R. Nuzum, Judge of the Circuit Court of Randolph County, in continuing petitioner’s case over petitioner’s objection, violates his right to a speedy trial and the guarantee provided by W.Va.Code, 62-3-1 [1981].

W.Va.Code, 62-3-21 [1959] is the legislative definition of the constitutional right to a speedy trial, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shorter v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Holstein v. CaseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Workman v. FuryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SpenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Good v. HandlanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Keller v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Murray v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API