Legal Opinion

In re Hopfl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the Second Judicial Department in 1960. This motion by petitioner is to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys by reason of his conviction in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, of violation of section 645 of title 15 of the *162United States Code. As here pertinent, that section has to do with false statements made to obtain money under chapter 14A ("Aid to Small Business”) of title 15 ("Commerce and Trade”). The charge was that respondent had submitted a false writing "to the Small and Business…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In re ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. In re PeltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BrickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. In re NovickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re SchiffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API