State v. Jones

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the State’s motions to hold briefing in abeyance pending resolution of a possible conflict of interest by appellants’ counsel in the above-entitled cases, and in accordance with this Court’s oral ruling announced at the hearing on the State’s motions on March 14, 1994, this Court finds that:(1) Based on the record in these cases it appears that the Appellate Public Defender has raised issues of ineffective assistance of counsel where the counsel below was also a public defender;(2) While we make no finding that a conflict exists, we believe…