Legal Opinion

Lovell v. United States

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-C-812-S, 83-C-813-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

The Court has previously denied summary judgment in these consolidated cases because the defendant had failed to dispel the notion of the existence of disputed facts relative to the requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 6702. Defendant has filed a new motion for summary judgment which highlights documentary facts that resolve any genuine issues of fact. Accordingly, summary judgment will be granted.

FACTS

The facts previously set forth in the Court’s order of January 30, 1984 are hereby adopted for purposes of this decision. In addition, the Court notes the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Commissioner v. KowalskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michael W. Lovell and Phyllis D. Lovell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
  3. United States v. HoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Reed v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  5. Beckelhimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API