Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 2006No. A06A0212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Following a bench trial, the court found Victor Gillespie guilty of one count of simple battery and one count of simple assault. Since Gillespie was charged under the family violence provision of OCGA § 16-5-23 (f), the misdemeanor battery offense was “of a high and aggravated nature.” On appeal, Gillespie contends the evidence is insufficient to establish his guilt on the battery charge as the State failed to prove the existence of a familial relationship between himself and the victim. In a related argument, Gillespie contends *244that the trial court erred in sentencing him…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Blackmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Connelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Diego Ramos-Garcia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  3. Elmer Moffitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  4. Gillespie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Mark Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API