Legal Opinion
Weber v. Eisentrager
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1992No. C7-92-373PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants Grace E. Weber and Mary E. Peters challenge a trial court’s award of title to real estate to respondent Roy Eisen-trager. The trial court ruled that the Marketable Title Act extinguished appellants’ claim to the property. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1933, appellants’ father, sole owner of the realty at issue, died intestate. The probate court awarded appellants’ mother a life estate in the property and appellants ■ the remainder. Appellants were unaware of their interest in the property. The record does not reveal the reason for appellants’ lack of knowledge; while bad…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weber v. EisentragerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993