Legal Opinion

Isaacs v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 9, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Eogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming...Plaintiff, Silas Isaacs, brought this action against defendant, Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The trial court sustained a demurrer to, and dismissed, the petition as amended. Plaintiff appeals. .

Omitting the prayer, the original petition is as follows :

“The plaintiff says that within less than twelve months last past he was in the employ of the defendant company, and that the place of work was in the yards of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. H. G. Nunnelley Co. v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Southern RailwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. MusicCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API