Legal Opinion

A & B Bolt & Supply Inc. v. Standard Offshore Services, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 2003No. 2002 CA 1823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[2PETTIGREW, J.

In this case, A & B Bolt and Supply, Inc. (“A & B Bolt”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its Rule for Judgment Pro Confesso in a garnishment proceeding filed against Hibernia National Bank (“Hibernia”) as garnishee, relative to a judgment obtained by A & B Bolt against Standard Offshore Services, Inc. (“Standard”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 24, 2001, A & B Bolt obtained a judgment against Standard in the amount of $28,736.46, together with legal interest from the date due until paid and attorney fees in the amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Whitney National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  2. Allied Finance Co. v. RogersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Guillot v. Union BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Mahler v. First National Bank of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Kugle v. HennessyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v. AndrusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Castelle M. AndrusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API