Legal Opinion

Rubens v. Costello

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1952No. 5460PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Frank S. Rubens, plaintiff below, brought suit against the appellees, Peter Costello and Margaret S. Costello, defendants below, to recover on a check made to appellant by Peter Costello, which check for $500 was allegedly given “in payment of ten participating shares in 98% of all revenue earned from drilling, exploiting or sale of certain oil and gas leases on lands located in Hidalgo County, New Mexico, as shown by that certain ‘Beneficial Trust’ agreement” Defendants stopped payment on the check and this suit resulted. From an adverse judgment the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. State of Arizona v. Ronnie Roy VeraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Tellez v. SabanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API