Legal Opinion
Garvin v. Secretary of State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 7, 2004No. A03A2145PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
We granted Jim Garvin’s1 application for discretionary appeal to review the judgment of the superior court affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Securities2 that Garvin sold unregistered securities, and did so without himself being registered as a dealer or *67salesperson authorized to sell securities. For the following reasons, we affirm.
In 1999, Garvin, acting as a commissioned sales representative for Bee Communications, Inc., sold Lexa Kommor five coin-operated payphones for $7,000 each. According to Kommor, she agreed to pay the $35,000 sum for the payphones…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Truelove v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Atofina Chemicals Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Cox v. GarvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Cox v. GarvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Garvin v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Garvin v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004