Legal Opinion
Joiner v. Chartwells and Compass Group North America
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 4, 2007No. Civil Action 3-05-cv-845 (JCH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 70) AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. No. 124)
HALL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, David Joiner, has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), alleging race discrimination and retaliation against the defendants, Chartwells and Compass Group North America (collectively, “Chartwells”). This court properly has jurisdiction over this matter, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367.
Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Chartwells has moved for summary judgment (Doc. No. 70).…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crawford v. Sysco Food Services of Connecticut, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008