Legal Opinion

Hatton v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 31, 1981No. C-3-80-162Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY CONDITIONALLY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF COUNSEL

RICE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendant State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) seeking Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 56. On April 8, 1980, Gordon Hatton filed a complaint against State Farm in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, requesting damages for negligence and breach of contract. Defendant filed a petition for removal to this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  5. Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API