Legal Opinion

In re Robinson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1941No. 20895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

This is a review of the order of the Referee dismissing the claim of the petitioner in a reclamation proceeding. The petitioner asks to have awarded to it, the proceeds of certain machinery used in the manufacturing of furniture, of which it alleges it was owner, and merely gave to the bankrupts, the possession and right of user. The petitioner asserts its right under a certain written agreement with the bankrupts dated June 18, 1938, which it maintains is a bailment lease and that all the machinery comes within the scope of this written agreement and should accordingly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. Motors Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. In re Press Printers & Publishers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  5. Valincenti v. Central Motors Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Aspen Impressions, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. In re RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. General Refrigerator & Store Fixture Co. v. Patterson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952
  4. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API