Delagrange v. Sacramento Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Plaintiff Delagrange appeals after nonjury trial from an adverse judgment on his first amended complaint (hereinafter, “complaint”). Plaintiff attacks, however, only that portion of the judgment which ordered dismissal of the second and third causes of action of the complaint, 1 contending that the allegations of the latter counts were sufficient to resist the demurrer of defendant Sacramento Savings and Loan Association, and hence that the judgment of dismissal based upon the sustaining of the demurrer must be reversed.
Defendant’s demurrer was both general and special, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- California Ammonia Co. v. MacCo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Zinke v. Zinke Rebottoming Shoe Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Papadakis v. ZelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Diaz v. Prof'l Cmty. Mgmt., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Austin v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Cotton Belt Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Chapman v. Hyundai Motor America CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.