Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) While evidence in a suit for personal injuries that the defendant is protected by liability insurance is inadmissible, as being irrelevant and immaterial, and it is the general rule that, where the mere exclusipn of such evidence and appropriate instructions from the court to disregard it and remarks of counsel thereon can not disabuse the prejudicial impression created upon the jury, a mistrial should be granted (O’Neill Mfg. Co. v. Pruitt, 110 Ga. 577, 579 (36 S. E. 59); Heinz v. Backus, 34 Ga. App. 203, 128 S. E. 915), still, where it appears that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Heinz v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Central Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Faber v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Wilson v. St. Joe Boom Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Farrar v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Leggett v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Minnick v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Goldstein v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.