Legal Opinion

In re Oskar Tiebemann & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 7, 1957No. 1764PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon a motion to dismiss the petition for exoneration from or limitation of liability filed by Oskar Tiedemann and Company as owner of the Steamship Elna II, or, in the alternative, to transfer the petition to the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, said action being No. 1764 in Admiralty. Admiralty Rule 54 provides:

“Rule 54. Courts having cognizance of limited liability procedure
“The said petition shall be filed and the said proceedings had in any District Court of the United States in which said vessel has been…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roberts Brothers, Inc. v. Kurtz Bros.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  2. Country Maid, Inc. v. HaseotesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Trader v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. U. S. Coast Guard Vessel CG-95321District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1963
  5. In re Oskar Tiedemann & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API