Legal Opinion

Rakowski v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 14, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The dispositive issue raised by plaintiff's appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff, Matilda Rakowski, was twenty-five years of age at the time of her employment by defendant corporation to fluoroscope rubber beltings to determine if there were any defects therein. The X-ray department, where she was employed, consisted of two rooms, one wherein the fluoroscopic X-ray machine was located and an adjacent room where she operated it. The rubber belts were placed on pulleys in the room where the fluoroscopic machine was located, outside of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beck v. Monmouth Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  2. Lipschitz v. New York & New Jersey Produce Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Anderson v. Jersey City Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  4. Heyer v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Seckler v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. LikeWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Shafer v. HB Thomas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Canonico v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Kress v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Kahalili v. Rosecliff Realty, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API